Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 6 Feb 2017 16:18:03 +0100
From:      Ed Schouten <ed@nuxi.nl>
To:        Allan Jude <allanjude@freebsd.org>
Cc:        src-committers <src-committers@freebsd.org>, svn-src-all@freebsd.org,  svn-src-head@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r313329 - in head: bin/ed secure/usr.bin secure/usr.bin/bdes usr.bin usr.bin/enigma
Message-ID:  <CABh_MKn=20289jkYHikaqnFd%2BQbV-nvBOP=khiB6jeKcbiLAAQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <201702060827.v168RJQY056084@repo.freebsd.org>
References:  <201702060827.v168RJQY056084@repo.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Allan,

2017-02-06 9:27 GMT+01:00 Allan Jude <allanjude@freebsd.org>:
>   The use of DES for anything is discouraged, especially with a static IV of 0

Not entirely related to this, but still...

Do we want to go ahead and also remove DES support from crypt(3)?
Compared to the other crypt formats, the DES implementation seems
fairly large, uses global state, etc.

I can send out a change for code review if people {like,don't object to} this.

-- 
Ed Schouten <ed@nuxi.nl>
Nuxi, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands
KvK-nr.: 62051717



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CABh_MKn=20289jkYHikaqnFd%2BQbV-nvBOP=khiB6jeKcbiLAAQ>