From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Apr  8 17:58:50 2011
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033)
	id 881861065673; Fri,  8 Apr 2011 17:58:50 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2011 17:58:50 +0000
From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>
To: bf1783@gmail.com
Message-ID: <20110408175850.GA69273@FreeBSD.org>
References: <201104072239.p37Md9oh031253@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<BANLkTikmUZsHNjw2Jpe8Y7v5CD6WkZGtoQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110408022459.GA40411@FreeBSD.org>
	<20110408023021.GA47293@FreeBSD.org>
	<BANLkTik4HrVvVNU_nBtH8Oyt=81uKjn6og@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110408035430.GA56549@FreeBSD.org>
	<BANLkTinCm=6zuzopMKi1v=5ehohOGM5nYg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110408153710.GA28200@FreeBSD.org>
	<BANLkTim2+Nq9QaPpKQYjPmtnfOf5bBt7GA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTim2+Nq9QaPpKQYjPmtnfOf5bBt7GA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Cc: Rene Ladan <rene@freebsd.org>, cvs-ports@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org,
	ports-committers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/www/chromium Makefile
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree
	<cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:58:50 -0000

On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 05:52:46PM +0000, b. f. wrote:
> On 4/8/11, Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org> wrote:
> > Summarizing our discussion, what do you think of the following?
> >
> > .if ! ${MACHINE_CPU:Msse2} || defined(PACKAGE_BUILDING) && ${ARCH} !=
> > "amd64"
> > GYP_DEFINES+=	disable_sse2=1
> > .endif
> >
> > Default package would have reasonable defaults now, custom port build can
> > be controlled by passing desired MACHINE_CPU.  Building SSE2-enabled
> > package for i386 is a bit tricky, but cannot be possibly polluted by
> > stale cached OPTIONS value.
> 
> Sorry, I tried to convey in my previous message that I was mistaken in
> thinking that the earlier changes would cause problems for the default
> i386 packages.  Packages for the machine hosting the build, and those
> built for generic machines via the portbuild scripts, have the right
> settings now, so I would leave the port as it is.  [...]

Let it be then.  Rene, please ignore my last patch; current revision of
Makefile should be OK until further issues arise.

./damfe