Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 09:55:43 -0500 From: "fbsd_user" <fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com> To: "Goran Gajic" <ggajic@afrodita.rcub.bg.ac.yu>, <fbsd@douville.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: IP Routing Question Message-ID: <MIEPLLIBMLEEABPDBIEGCEDIHNAA.fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0602141535130.10886@afrodita.rcub.bg.ac.yu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
You are not correct in that last statement. ipfilter does not have to be compiled into kernel to work. You should read the handbook ipfilter firewall section where it clearly states that is not necessary and tells you how to do it. -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Goran Gajic Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 9:44 AM To: fbsd@douville.net Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IP Routing Question Hi, You can try using ipf filter to impose source-policy routing: cat > ipf.example pass in quick on em1 to em1:192.168.1.2 from 10.1.0.0/16 to a.b.c.d/32 ^d ipf -f ipf.example This way you will re-route all packets coming from source 10.1/16 to destination a.b.c.d to go to address 192.168.1.2 not to a.b.c.d Note that you have to rebuild your kernel in order to have options IPFILTER enabled. Regards, gg. >I'm trying to set up the routing table to force requests to certain IP >addresses to use a particular ethernet card. I've used the route command >in a number of >ways, but still can't come up with how to force to use em1 instead of >em0, >with the right gateway. _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?MIEPLLIBMLEEABPDBIEGCEDIHNAA.fbsd_user>