Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 15:39:23 -0800 From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Archie Cobbs <archie@dellroad.org> Cc: julian@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: divert(4) socket isn't connection oriented Message-ID: <41993E2B.9060902@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <200411152334.iAFNY1oS003137@arch20m.dellroad.org> References: <200411152334.iAFNY1oS003137@arch20m.dellroad.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Archie Cobbs wrote: >Julian Elischer wrote: > > >>If I did it again I think I'd suggest that divert not be a part of the >>INET family.. >>It was easiest tat that time to make it so.. >>Archie, do you remember why we decided this? >> >> > >At the time, the goal was to minimize the size of the divert patch rather >than maximizing elegance, because this was determined to give it a better >chance of being committed... in hindsight we could have structured things >more clearly. > yeah I remember now..
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?41993E2B.9060902>