From owner-freebsd-java Tue Mar 6 10: 7:30 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from ns.yogotech.com (ns.yogotech.com [206.127.123.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84E0537B71D for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2001 10:07:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nate@yogotech.com) Received: from nomad.yogotech.com (nomad.yogotech.com [206.127.123.131]) by ns.yogotech.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA09131; Tue, 6 Mar 2001 11:07:24 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from nate@nomad.yogotech.com) Received: (from nate@localhost) by nomad.yogotech.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA09746; Tue, 6 Mar 2001 11:07:23 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from nate) From: Nate Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15013.10075.22410.630598@nomad.yogotech.com> Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2001 11:07:23 -0700 (MST) To: "Daniel M. Eischen" Cc: java@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Java and libc/libpthread In-Reply-To: <3AA52622.CA33EBE2@vigrid.com> References: <3AA52622.CA33EBE2@vigrid.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under 21.1 (patch 12) "Channel Islands" XEmacs Lucid Reply-To: nate@yogotech.com (Nate Williams) Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > I'm currently working on an NxN libpthread implementation as > an interim solution until we get KSEs. The goal is to get > this done before 5.0. How is this different from the current implementation? > Unfortunately I don't have the time to help the Java porting > effort, but I would like to hear about any problems the porters > are having with our current libc and any expected problems from > a libpthread that will act very similar to linuxthreads. Will do... Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message