From owner-freebsd-current Thu Dec 12 12: 2:21 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F4B737B401 for ; Thu, 12 Dec 2002 12:02:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.tcoip.com.br (erato.tco.net.br [200.220.254.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6AA943ED1 for ; Thu, 12 Dec 2002 12:02:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dcs@tcoip.com.br) Received: from tcoip.com.br ([10.0.2.6]) by mail.tcoip.com.br (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gBCK2DV10799; Thu, 12 Dec 2002 18:02:13 -0200 Message-ID: <3DF8EB45.8080109@tcoip.com.br> Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 18:02:13 -0200 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.2b) Gecko/20021212 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, pt-br, ja MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mike Makonnen Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RC NG, ntp and routed References: <3DF61DE4.9070205@tcoip.com.br> <20021210225014.GA22267@matrix.identd.net> <20021211002318.GT45512@roark.gnf.org> <20021211054754.GA23972@matrix.identd.net> <20021211063348.GU45512@roark.gnf.org> <20021211084603.GA24584@matrix.identd.net> <20021211171527.GW45512@roark.gnf.org> <3DF775AC.40507@tcoip.com.br> <20021212053826.GB30023@matrix.identd.net> <3DF86054.7000400@tcoip.com.br> <20021212193737.GA33999@matrix.identd.net> In-Reply-To: <3DF61DE4.9070205@tcoip.com.br> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Mike Makonnen wrote: > > If you are using a daemon essential to network connectivity in /usr/local > and at the same time have it (/usr/local) mounted remotely, then you > haven't > thought things through properly. > > Listen, I think we're talking past each other here. I _am_ in favour of > adding routing to NETWORKING (look at an earlier email in the thread). > My only argument is that if an admin chooses to use a daemon > from ports then he should be bright enough to > include it in a local filesystem. Good. That's what I'm saying too. :-) Well, that, and that local filesystems should be mounted before networking, and remote fs afterwards (which, as I see, is the present case). -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) Gerencia de Operacoes Divisao de Comunicacao de Dados Coordenacao de Seguranca TCO Fones: 55-61-313-7654/Cel: 55-61-9618-0904 E-mail: Daniel.Capo@tco.net.br Daniel.Sobral@tcoip.com.br dcs@tcoip.com.br Outros: dcs@newsguy.com dcs@freebsd.org capo@notorious.bsdconspiracy.net "A University without students is like an ointment without a fly." -- Ed Nather, professor of astronomy at UT Austin To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message