From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 29 21:45:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB0C116A403; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 21:45:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=julian=420c9c4b2@elischer.org) Received: from a50.ironport.com (a50.ironport.com [63.251.108.112]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94C5E43D70; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 21:45:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from prvs=julian=420c9c4b2@elischer.org) Received: from unknown (HELO [10.251.18.229]) ([10.251.18.229]) by a50.ironport.com with ESMTP; 29 Sep 2006 14:45:18 -0700 Message-ID: <451D93EE.9040309@elischer.org> Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 14:45:18 -0700 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20060414 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Baldwin References: <451ADC21.50206@centtech.com> <200609271727.29775.jhb@freebsd.org> <451D4787.4050309@samsco.org> <200609291618.09492.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <200609291618.09492.jhb@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: isofs/cd9660 -> relocate to fs/isofs/cd9660? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 21:45:24 -0000 John Baldwin wrote: >On Friday 29 September 2006 12:19, Scott Long wrote: > > >>John Baldwin wrote: >> >> >>>On Wednesday 27 September 2006 16:43, Scott Long wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>Eric Anderson wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>I noticed that cd9660 file system is in sys/isofs/cd9660 instead of what >>>>>seems more logical: sys/fs/cd9660. Is there any reason not to move it? >>>>> Curious mostly.. >>>>> >>>>>Eric >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>Inertia, mostly. And if you move cd9660, do you also move ufs? Let the >>>>bi-yearly debate begin..... >>>> >>>>Btw, this is a topic that is easily searched on, as it gets brought up >>>>fairly regularly. We were a bit late on the schedule this time, though, >>>>so thanks for giving it a kickstart. >>>> >>>> >>>We've actually moved most of the filesystems into sys/fs in the past. >>> >>> >Only > > >>>cd9660, nfs, and ufs are in the top-level. I'd still say leave nfs and >>> >>> >ufs > > >>>alone, but sys/isofs/cd9660 -> sys/fs/cd9660 (I wouldn't keep the extra >>> >>> >isofs > > >>>directory) probably wouldn't be but so painful at this point. >>> >>> >>> >>What about moving all of the net* directories into /sys/net?. And >>don't forget putting i386 and friends into /sys/arch! Ah, I love the >>smell of fresh paint in the morning. Smells like.... napalm. >> >> > >Baby steps aren't hard. :) Back when I first made rumblings about this sort >of thing we didn't have a sys/fs at all, but now we do and over time we've >actually moved most of our filesystems into it. :) > > > there was a sys/miscfs which could have been used.. Matt Dillon took the oportunity to redo the tree in DF. I wonder how that's working out?