From owner-freebsd-questions  Sun Oct  1 12:58:13 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mailhost01.reflexnet.net (mailhost01.reflexnet.net [64.6.192.82])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B89337B503
	for <questions@freebsd.org>; Sun,  1 Oct 2000 12:58:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 149.211.6.64.reflexcom.com ([64.6.211.149]) by mailhost01.reflexnet.net  with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.197.19);
	 Sun, 1 Oct 2000 12:52:40 -0700
Received: (from cjc@localhost)
	by 149.211.6.64.reflexcom.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) id e91Jrqj56803;
	Sun, 1 Oct 2000 12:53:52 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from cjc)
Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2000 12:53:51 -0700
From: "Crist J . Clark" <cjclark@reflexnet.net>
To: Artem Koutchine <matrix@ipform.ru>
Cc: Jan Knepper <jan@smartsoft.cc>, questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: NAT trafic accounting
Message-ID: <20001001125351.I25121@149.211.6.64.reflexcom.com>
Reply-To: cjclark@alum.mit.edu
References: <024d01c02b1a$bce2d420$0c00a8c0@ipform.ru> <39D77148.98C1CB9C@smartsoft.cc> <001601c02bcf$aa413a40$0c00a8c0@ipform.ru>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i
In-Reply-To: <001601c02bcf$aa413a40$0c00a8c0@ipform.ru>; from matrix@ipform.ru on Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 09:47:12PM +0400
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 09:47:12PM +0400, Artem Koutchine wrote:
> From: "Jan Knepper" <jan@smartsoft.cc>
> > Artem Koutchine wrote:
> >
> > > I have the following configuration:
> > > Interfaces: ed0 - NAT interface (192.168.0.1) and ed1 - real ip
> interface
> > > (212.34.47.x)
> >
> > Hmmm, I thought that natd was supposed to run on ed1, the interface with
> IP
> > 212.34.47.x in your case...
> 
> Um.. I am really sorry, my mistake. I mixed everything up
> .
> ed0 - 212.34.47.x
> ed1 - 192.168.0.1
> 
> nat is on ed0
> 
> people from 192.168.0.x browse internet and also access database on the
> 192.167.0.1,
        ^
Typo, right?

> i need to count only internet traffic for each of the users (there are only
> 5 of them, static
> IPs, of course, on the local network, win98 workstations)
> 
> ANy idea how can i trafic that nat trafic?

How to 'trafic' the NAT 'trafic?' Huh? Are you asking how to count
again?

I still don't see why,

  # ipfw add 100x count ip from 192.168.0.x to not 192.168.0.0/24
  # ipfw add 101x count ip from not 192.168.0.0/24 to 192.168.0.x

Wouldn't work.
-- 
Crist J. Clark                           cjclark@alum.mit.edu


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message