Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2000 07:57:57 -0500 From: Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu> To: Rasmus Kaj <kaj@raditex.se> Cc: Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami <asami@FreeBSD.ORG>, Brandon Fosdick <bfoz@glue.umd.edu>, Neil Blakey-Milner <nbm@mithrandr.moria.org>, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: RFC: Ports layout reorganization (Re: ports tree idea: Combine DESCR and COMMENT) Message-ID: <20000929075757.A75085@puck.firepipe.net> In-Reply-To: <84pulntrv3.fsf@frodo.sickla.raditex.se>; from kaj@raditex.se on Fri, Sep 29, 2000 at 12:28:00PM %2B0200 References: <39CD200B.A10214EA@glue.umd.edu> <20000923233215.A45139@mithrandr.moria.org> <39CD295E.453FF278@glue.umd.edu> <vqcsnqjin86.fsf_-_@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> <84pulntrv3.fsf@frodo.sickla.raditex.se>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Sep 29, 2000 at 12:28:00PM +0200, Rasmus Kaj wrote: > If we put the checksum (size / date / whatever) in variables in the > Makefile we get away from that problem. But maybe that creates other, > worse, problems? I't has been suggested before, so it's probably got > turned down for a good reason. Because it's not feasible for larger ports. And even for the smaller ones.. nah, just ain't worth trying to write a makesum target for that. I say we keep it in a separate file in the root port directory. -- Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu> - Physics Computer Network wench The Universal Answer to All Problems - "It has something to do with physics." -- Comic on door of Room 240, Physics Building, Purdue University To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000929075757.A75085>