From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Apr 9 16:39:34 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id QAA20502 for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 9 Apr 1995 16:39:34 -0700 Received: from UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU (root@UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU [129.7.1.11]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id QAA20495 for ; Sun, 9 Apr 1995 16:39:30 -0700 Received: from Taronga.COM by UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU with UUCP id AA22011 (5.67a/IDA-1.5); Sun, 9 Apr 1995 18:13:24 -0500 Received: by bonkers.taronga.com (smail2.5p) id AA01311; 9 Apr 95 18:12:06 CDT (Sun) Received: (from peter@localhost) by bonkers.taronga.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) id SAA01308; Sun, 9 Apr 1995 18:12:06 -0500 From: Peter da Silva Message-Id: <199504092312.SAA01308@bonkers.taronga.com> Subject: Re: should su retain ${DISPLAY} To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de Date: Sun, 9 Apr 1995 18:12:05 -0500 (CDT) Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <199504091652.SAA07493@uriah.heep.sax.de> from "J Wunsch" at Apr 9, 95 06:52:42 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 653 Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > > Speaking of su, why the hell doesnt FreeBSD's su support -c cmd like > > > every other su on the planet? > > Hmmmm. Therein lies a mystery! > > I believe we lost this in the 1.x transition! :-( > We've never had it. The word `every' in the above sentence must be > `every second'. bonkers% su root -c who Password: root ttyv0 Mar 21 19:12 peter ttyv1 Mar 21 19:13 arielle tty03 Mar 22 07:37 arielle ttyp1 Apr 9 14:14 (:0.0) arielle ttyp2 Apr 9 14:19 (:0.0) peter ttyp3 Apr 9 12:36 (:1.0) peter ttyp4 Apr 9 05:42 (:1.0) bonkers% uname -a FreeBSD bonkers.taronga.com 1.1.5.1(RELEASE) BONKERS#22 i386