From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Oct 12 12:17: 8 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from donhm.calcasieu.com (tcnet01-45.austin.texas.net [209.99.40.45]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B71771509B for ; Tue, 12 Oct 1999 12:17:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dread@texas.net) Received: from donhm.calcasieu.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by donhm.calcasieu.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA53800; Tue, 12 Oct 1999 14:16:10 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dread@texas.net) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.3.1 [p0] on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <98966.939731166@axl.noc.iafrica.com> Date: Tue, 12 Oct 1999 14:16:09 -0500 (CDT) From: Don Read To: Sheldon Hearn Subject: Re: XClock UTC? Cc: (FreeBSD Questions) , cjclark@home.com Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 12-Oct-99 Sheldon Hearn wrote: > > > On Tue, 12 Oct 1999 14:22:59 +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote: > >> No. From the xclock manpage: > > Damn, I made a mistake when checking for existing follow-ups to your > question, otherwise I wouldn't have embarrassed myself like this. > > Anyone know when xclock started grokking TZ? > My understanding is libc.[a/so] handled localtime conversions. Regards, --- Don Read dread@calcasieu.com EDP Manager dread@texas.net Calcasieu Lumber Co. Austin TX -- the Y2K bug is not a problem. W2K however ... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message