From owner-freebsd-ports Sat Aug 19 9:31:58 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from net2.dinoex.sub.org (net2.dinoex.de [212.184.201.182]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7A2537B423 for ; Sat, 19 Aug 2000 09:31:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gate.dinoex.sub.org (dinoex@localhost) by net2.dinoex.sub.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with BSMTP id e7JGU5g29425; Sat, 19 Aug 2000 18:30:05 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org) To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG, bmah@cisco.com Message-ID: From: dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org (Dirk Meyer) Organization: privat Subject: Re: Indicating patch levels Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2000 18:28:50 +0200 X-Mailer: Dinoex 1.76 References: <20000817193048.A338@argon.gryphonsoft.com> <20000817193048.A338@argon.gryphonsoft.com> <200008191617.e7JGH7Q30715@bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com> X-Gateway: ZCONNECT gate.dinoex.sub.org [UNIX/Connect 0.90] X-PGP-Fingerprint: 44 16 EC 0A D3 3A 4F 28 8A 8A 47 93 F1 CF 2F 12 X-Copyright: (C) Copyright 1999 by Dirk Meyer -- All rights reserved. X-PGP-Key-Avail: mailto:pgp-public-keys@keys.de.pgp.net Subject:GET 0x331CDA5D X-ZC-VIA: 20000819000000S+2@dinoex.sub.org X-Accept-Language: de,en X-Noad: Please don't send me ad's by mail. I'm bored by this type of mail. X-Note: sending SPAM is a violation of both german and US law and will at least trigger a complaint at your provider's postmaster. Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Bruce A. Mah wrote:, > I agree with Kris on the point of numerical revisions, in that it's much > easier for pkg_version to parse these rather than the arbitrary > revisions. It's also not clear whether, for example, "-enh1-bugfix2" > supercedes "-enh2-bugfix1" or not. Maybe this latter issue isn't a > problem though. I have no problem with a numeric PATCHLEVEL, lets get it to work. kind regards Dirk - Dirk Meyer, Im Grund 4, 34317 Habichtswald, Germany To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message