From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 21 14: 3:48 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from dt051n0b.san.rr.com (dt051n0b.san.rr.com [204.210.32.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A483F37B606 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 14:03:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Doug@gorean.org) Received: from gorean.org (master [10.0.0.2]) by dt051n0b.san.rr.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA15135; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 14:03:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Doug@gorean.org) Message-ID: <38B1B5D2.1478C9D2@gorean.org> Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 14:01:54 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Adam D. Marks" Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: inetd? References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "Adam D. Marks" wrote: > > I was curious if it is posible to have different inetd configurations for > different network interfaces. No, it's not. You could accomplish the same thing by enabling all of the services you want in inetd.conf and then restricting access to those ports with a firewall like ipfw or ipfilter. Depending on exactly what you want to do, you might be able to do the same thing with just hosts.allow. Good luck, Doug -- "Welcome to the desert of the real." - Laurence Fishburne as Morpheus, "The Matrix" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message