From owner-freebsd-security  Tue Jan  9  9:58:28 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Received: from orthanc.ab.ca (207-167-15-66.dsl.worldgate.ca [207.167.15.66])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02C0837B6D5
	for <freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue,  9 Jan 2001 09:58:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from orthanc.ab.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by orthanc.ab.ca (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f09Hr4x03729;
	Tue, 9 Jan 2001 10:53:04 -0700 (MST)
	(envelope-from lyndon@orthanc.ab.ca)
Message-Id: <200101091753.f09Hr4x03729@orthanc.ab.ca>
To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>
Cc: cjclark@alum.mit.edu, Marc Silver <marcs@draenor.org>,
	freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: What do these mean? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "09 Jan 2001 11:12:02 +0100."
             <xzpd7dxghl9.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> 
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2001 10:53:04 -0700
From: Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@orthanc.ab.ca>
Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

>>>>> "Dag-Erling" == Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> writes:

    Dag-Erling> This isn't the only bogosity related to dynamic rules
    Dag-Erling> in ipfw; for instance, 'ipfw list' always lists *all*
    Dag-Erling> dynamic rules even if you specify a rule number on the
    Dag-Erling> command line (it should only display dynamic rules
    Dag-Erling> which were created by the rules listed on the command
    Dag-Erling> line).

Please see PR bin/18550, which has been sitting in the queue for eight
months. It contains a fix for this behaviour.

--lyndon


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message