From owner-freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Thu Nov 5 23:24:36 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98353A27644; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 23:24:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from baptiste.daroussin@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-x231.google.com (mail-wi0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C63D178D; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 23:24:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from baptiste.daroussin@gmail.com) Received: by wicll6 with SMTP id ll6so19922643wic.0; Thu, 05 Nov 2015 15:24:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=k7nsaQXFlzKtZ7SzBD7H2xgsmMFpGUPwD1fXfOr/w5c=; b=KiFfRxQ+P68MssOZpFAYAeXxPo0d6c96za3H+R5OT27Xmk7oFSZmR4Q//eAgcM1cj0 lcGgW58t83C9SjF80+ws36ClmF6PllWqFMNI20gNQZHxCBrNmw1ZGjebeLQePwuTJqsV udF9lMsdh/D/30W88m7SLjSaCI17PL/EDgmEQTLPHbt795uuJhDt/qCeSG0CXv4Em0/y bX3nM+iDeAEWRZiSVIN4cXg3Rjo4cN60I7tq6HiSjuulADXZzDHfHQckChqayI9xKpSZ DQkl2h9gARrCNamAilVoS1MRoNarYKdKIcx9o7COnbnM8AeGiEWGJbSIp6wU5eiI5MxG JmhQ== X-Received: by 10.194.24.38 with SMTP id r6mr12553792wjf.5.1446765874692; Thu, 05 Nov 2015 15:24:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net ([2001:41d0:8:db4c::1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m143sm117055wmb.1.2015.11.05.15.24.33 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 05 Nov 2015 15:24:33 -0800 (PST) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 00:24:32 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Adrian Chadd Cc: Peter Jeremy , Sean Bruno , freebsd-sparc64 , "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Sparc64 doesn't care about you, and you shouldn't care about Sparc64 Message-ID: <20151105232431.GE31432@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <563A5893.1030607@freebsd.org> <20151104214451.GF47630@server.rulingia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="hwvH6HDNit2nSK4j" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 23:24:36 -0000 --hwvH6HDNit2nSK4j Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 02:13:29PM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: > We don't have to expect clang support to work. Just having someone > champion the external toolchain stuff and getting sparc64 > world/kernel/release building from say, sparc64-gcc 5.x would be > enough. >=20 sparc64 has been the first arch that have been tested with external toolcha= in: build and run just fine. The problem with the external toolchain is that if you are not able to cross build the ports until you get a working toolchain available via packages, y= ou are doomed. And we do not have that Bapt --hwvH6HDNit2nSK4j Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlY75S8ACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EzlqwCgvxYFG54BuIxeZy+jBM1+s+9B 8pYAoKFAHDiwulAwd3fhkNhaO3mggOxM =TPPL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --hwvH6HDNit2nSK4j--