From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 23 11:43:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07914106566B for ; Sat, 23 Jan 2010 11:43:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Received: from ei.bzerk.org (tunnel490.ipv6.xs4all.nl [IPv6:2001:888:10:1ea::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D3468FC17 for ; Sat, 23 Jan 2010 11:43:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ei.bzerk.org (BOFH@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ei.bzerk.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o0NBg9xL021563; Sat, 23 Jan 2010 12:42:09 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Received: (from bulk@localhost) by ei.bzerk.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o0NBg9mn021562; Sat, 23 Jan 2010 12:42:09 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 12:42:09 +0100 From: Ruben de Groot To: Adrian Wontroba , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100123114209.GA21457@ei.bzerk.org> Mail-Followup-To: Ruben de Groot , Adrian Wontroba , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <20100122162155.GG3917@e-Gitt.NET> <20100123012328.GA3296@swelter.hanley.stade.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100123012328.GA3296@swelter.hanley.stade.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on ei.bzerk.org X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (ei.bzerk.org [127.0.0.1]); Sat, 23 Jan 2010 12:43:14 +0100 (CET) Cc: Subject: Re: 8.0-RELEASE -> -STABLE and size of / X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 11:43:16 -0000 On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 01:23:28AM +0000, Adrian Wontroba typed: > I concur that the 235 MB size of an amd64 8.0 kernel is a bit of a > surprise. An i386 kernel is a mere 135 MB. IMO increasing the sysinstall > default root slice size for at least amd64 would be a good thing. To be a little more precise: it's not the >kernel< that is so big. It's all the (mostly not needed) modules and symbol files that fill up /