Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 25 Nov 2013 18:05:16 +1030
From:      Shane Ambler <FreeBSD@ShaneWare.Biz>
To:        "Christopher J. Ruwe" <cjr@cruwe.de>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: poudirere behave-alike for
Message-ID:  <5292FDB4.4090100@ShaneWare.Biz>
In-Reply-To: <20131125021559.1af33188@dijkstra.cruwe.de>
References:  <20131125021559.1af33188@dijkstra.cruwe.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 25/11/2013 11:45, Christopher J. Ruwe wrote:
> I think my question is slightly off-topic, but I think freebsd-ports@
> may be the best of many not so good fits:
> 
> I need to build packages for Solaris and SmartOS. My first choice
> would be ports, which unfortunately are not very well suited to
> cross-building. Instead I use, as many people, pkgsrc.
> 
> I would like to leverage pkgsrc with something like poudriere,
> especially as I have ZFS and zones in Solaris/SmartOS. I found in a
> message on the DragonFlyBSD list
> http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/mailarchive/users/2013-01/msg00008.html
> a mention of poudriere being used on DragonFly/pkgsrc.
> 
> Does anybody know of the state of this piece of software? The git
> repos I can find on google are stale links. As etoilebsd is
> referenced in the mail from DragonFly, I chose to ask here first.

The freebsd ports tree at
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/ports-mgmt/poudriere/
shows poudriere source is downloaded from
http://fossil.etoilebsd.net/poudriere/tarball/

I think the best place to start would be the DPorts as it mentions they
needed to patch it to work on Dragonfly - those patches will highlight
the changes you need to make so should be the best start.




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5292FDB4.4090100>