From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Aug 7 13:33:42 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from freeway.dcfinc.com (cx74889-a.phnx3.az.home.com [24.1.193.157]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB9CE37B876 for ; Mon, 7 Aug 2000 13:33:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from chad@freeway.dcfinc.com) Received: (from chad@localhost) by freeway.dcfinc.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA06873; Mon, 7 Aug 2000 13:33:31 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from chad) From: "Chad R. Larson" Message-Id: <200008072033.NAA06873@freeway.dcfinc.com> Subject: Re: 3.5-STABLE and posix4/semaphore.h? In-Reply-To: from Jan Conrad at "Aug 7, 0 11:53:04 am" To: conrad@th.physik.uni-bonn.de (Jan Conrad) Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2000 13:33:30 -0700 (MST) Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Reply-To: chad@DCFinc.com Organization: DCF, Inc. X-O/S: FreeBSD 2.2.8-STABLE X-Unexpected: The Spanish Inquisition X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL40 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > On Sun, 6 Aug 2000, Chad R. Larson wrote: >> As I recall, Jan Conrad wrote: >>> sorry for asking, but is it correct that semaphore calls like >>> sem_destroy, even though defined in semaphore.h, are not implemented >>> under 3.5-STABLE? >> >> It is if you don't have >> >> options SYSVSEM >> >> in the config file you used to build your kernel. > > well - I *have* that option set Then I'll defer to the rest of the list for an answer. From looking around in /usr/src/sys/posix4 it seems someone (HD Associates) contributed POSIX scheduling as work-in-progress, with semaphores and async I/O to follow... -crl -- Chad R. Larson (CRL15) 602-953-1392 Brother, can you paradigm? chad@dcfinc.com chad@larsons.org larson1@home.net DCF, Inc. - 14623 North 49th Place, Scottsdale, Arizona 85254-2207 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message