From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 25 09:55:30 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFACC1065673 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2011 09:55:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from henk@signature.nl) Received: from dee.signature.nl (dee.signature.nl [81.18.162.68]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF87F8FC1A for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2011 09:55:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by dee.signature.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 410CC14D941; Thu, 25 Aug 2011 11:55:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dee.signature.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E2F714D929 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2011 11:55:29 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 11:55:29 +0200 (CEST) From: Henk van Oers To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20110824120044.9CFDB1065734@hub.freebsd.org> Message-ID: References: <20110824120044.9CFDB1065734@hub.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: portmaster -r vs. ports/UPDATING X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 09:55:31 -0000 [ multi -r arguments ] In article , Doug Barton writes: > On 08/25/2011 01:58, Matthias Andree wrote: [...] >> Perhaps this behaviour could change in a future version of portmaster, > > Patches are always welcome. Can I send some money? I also want to run portmaster -r without "argument list too long".