From owner-freebsd-current Sun Aug 13 13: 8: 4 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from guru.mired.org (zoom2-013.telepath.com [216.14.2.13]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3CB8A37B8EC for ; Sun, 13 Aug 2000 13:07:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mwm@mired.org) Received: (qmail 73129 invoked by uid 100); 13 Aug 2000 20:07:56 -0000 From: Mike Meyer MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <14743.28.213436.747232@guru.mired.org> Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2000 15:07:56 -0500 (CDT) To: Warner Losh Cc: Mike Meyer , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Build breakage (was: fail to compile kernel...) In-Reply-To: <200008131542.JAA08725@harmony.village.org> References: <14742.23628.110336.924637@guru.mired.org> <14742.15675.412839.269577@guru.mired.org> <14742.14082.837564.871879@guru.mired.org> <200008130553.XAA06673@harmony.village.org> <200008130714.BAA07153@harmony.village.org> <200008131542.JAA08725@harmony.village.org> X-Mailer: VM 6.72 under 21.1 (patch 10) "Capitol Reef" XEmacs Lucid X-face: "5Mnwy%?j>IIV\)A=):rjWL~NB2aH[}Yq8Z=u~vJ`"(,&SiLvbbz2W`;h9L,Yg`+vb1>RG% *h+%X^n0EZd>TM8_IB;a8F?(Fb"lw'IgCoyM.[Lg#r\ Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Warner Losh writes: > So we're down to stale sources at one of the mirrors, I think. My > kernel tree here is completely clean and checked out from the my local > cvs tree. Where do you get your sources from? What revision of > src/sys/dev/pccard/card_if.m do you have? The following changed fixes > it: > revision 1.7 > date: 2000/08/11 15:51:51; author: imp; state: Exp; lines: +8 -1 > Define get_memory_offset method > Which is Friday Morning MST (the time is GMT). Plenty of time for the > mirrors to be updated. Yes, the version I have is out of date. It came from cvsup5.freebsd.org over 24 hours after the commit. > : That may be true - which would mean it wouldn't be any better than > : FreeBSD has been for the past few months. Or any worse. On the other > : hand, breaking the build on other projects I've worked on was > : considered a major blunder. That doesn't seem to be the case here. > That is the case here. Believe me. But sitting around pointing > fingers after the problem has been fixed is usually not done. Again, I didn't mean to point fingers or complain about any specific person. I've been sitting on this for most of the last week; your change just happened to be the one that caused the problem this time. Pointing fingers isn't the difference I was talking about. It's more in the attitude after the fact. On FreeBSD, it's "Ok, I fixed it." Elsewhere, people apologize for breaking the bulid.