From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 19 15:00:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9044F16A4FF for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 15:00:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from postman.arcor.de (newsread1.arcor-online.net [151.189.0.146]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A0CE43D46 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 15:00:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com) Received: from fillmore.dyndns.org (port-212-202-51-138.reverse.qsc.de [212.202.51.138]) (authenticated bits=0)i2JN0Fck027843 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sat, 20 Mar 2004 00:00:16 +0100 (MET) Received: from [172.16.0.2] (helo=fillmore-labs.com) by fillmore.dyndns.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD) id 1B4SyJ-0009SK-4d; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 00:00:11 +0100 Message-ID: <405B7B7A.4030508@fillmore-labs.com> Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 00:00:10 +0100 From: Oliver Eikemeier Organization: Fillmore Labs GmbH - http://www.fillmore-labs.com/ MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kay Lehmann References: <405B7AE4.3000306@web.de> In-Reply-To: <405B7AE4.3000306@web.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: KMail/1.5.9 cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: creating a new port for FreeBSD-5 only? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 23:00:18 -0000 Kay Lehmann wrote: > Hello everybody, > > as said in the subject I would like to know if it is ok to create a port > for FreeBSD-5 only. It is a kde-dependend program which requires gcc >=3 > and so won't run on 4-stable as kdelibs are build with systems gcc, > which is incompatible with gcc-3 (or am I wrong?). So I don't know if I > should send-pr this or not. How should this be handled? There are already ports that don't work on 4.x, so you could mark it IGNORE on 4.x. OTOH you should ask on kde@ first if there is a known workaround to get your port working on 4.x Oliver