From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 19 18:20:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2EC116A403 for ; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 18:20:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A22D43D7F for ; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 18:20:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k3JIKFX4077626 for ; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 18:20:15 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k3JIKF3p077625; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 18:20:15 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 18:20:15 GMT Message-Id: <200604191820.k3JIKF3p077625@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: "Brian J. McGovern" Cc: Subject: Re: kern/95661: [pci] [patch] pci_pci still not correct for initializing cardbus on HP AMD laptop X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Brian J. McGovern" List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 18:20:23 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/95661; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Brian J. McGovern" To: Jung-uk Kim Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, mcgovern@beta.com, mcgovern@spoon.beta.com Subject: Re: kern/95661: [pci] [patch] pci_pci still not correct for initializing cardbus on HP AMD laptop Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 14:26:55 -0400 > This is handled differently in -CURRENT: > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/dev/pci/pci_pci.c.diff?r1=1.37 &r2=1.38 > > It requires SMBIOS support in loader, which is missing in RELENG_6. > > Jung-uk Kim Agreed, but it works in 6.0 and 6.1. My opinion is that this is a reasonable work around for the 6.x lifecycle until the "stable" tree moves to 7.x, and we get SMBIOS support. I could beg for MFC'ing SMBIOS support, but I think it'd be a much tougher sell, and I doubt I can talk anyone in to it for 6.1. :) -Brian