From owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 31 00:25:23 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00ADBB89 for ; Fri, 31 May 2013 00:25:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from flat.berklix.org (flat.berklix.org [83.236.223.115]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B53980E for ; Fri, 31 May 2013 00:25:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (p5DCBC3D7.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [93.203.195.215]) (authenticated bits=128) by flat.berklix.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r4V0Od94013252; Fri, 31 May 2013 02:24:39 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r4V0P5Du043520; Fri, 31 May 2013 02:25:05 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r4V0OhpY017628; Fri, 31 May 2013 02:25:00 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@fire.js.berklix.net) Message-Id: <201305310025.r4V0OhpY017628@fire.js.berklix.net> To: David Wolfskill Subject: Re: iwn(4) link down/up cycling From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://berklix.com BSD Unix Linux Consultancy, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://berklix.com/free/ X-URL: http://www.berklix.com In-reply-to: Your message "Wed, 29 May 2013 19:30:51 PDT." <20130530023051.GJ1334@albert.catwhisker.org> Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 02:24:43 +0200 Sender: jhs@berklix.com Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 00:25:23 -0000 David Wolfskill wrote: > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 06:54:40PM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > David Wolfskill wrote: > > ... > > > Have I done something avoidable to encourage this behavior? > >=20 > > Might this be a USB device coming & going ? ie might it be USB bus at fau= > lt ? > > ... > > I admit that hardware is not one of my stronger points, but I would Me either, on modern stuff :-) > think that the fact that the iwn0 device shows up in the output of > "pciconf -vl": > > iwn0@pci0:3:0:0: class=3D0x028000 card=3D0x12118086 chip=3D0x4237808= > 6 rev=3D0x00 hdr=3D0x00 > vendor =3D 'Intel Corporation' > device =3D 'PRO/Wireless 5100 AGN [Shiloh] Network Connection' > class =3D network > > gives reason to believe that the device is attached via PCI, rather > than USB. I hope. :-} Yes, I just plugged in a USB wireless run0 device & it made no difference to pciconf -lv output. > > But I appreciate the suggestion. Yup, sorry, was a long shot, & off target. Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultant, Munich http://berklix.com Reply below not above, like a play script. Indent old text with "> ". Send plain text. No quoted-printable, HTML, base64, multipart/alternative.