From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 25 21:41:23 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65F4616A41C for ; Wed, 25 May 2005 21:41:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd.nospam@mekanix.dk) Received: from mail.aaq.bolignet.dk (cpe.atm2-0-1021060.0x50a5f3f2.boanxx12.customer.tele.dk [80.165.243.242]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06C7D43D4C for ; Wed, 25 May 2005 21:41:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd.nospam@mekanix.dk) Received: from desktop.home (unknown [10.10.3.10]) by mail.aaq.bolignet.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B396205F9F; Wed, 25 May 2005 23:19:46 +0200 (CEST) From: Bjarne Wichmann Petersen To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 23:42:01 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <3248.172.16.0.199.1116876092.squirrel@172.16.0.1> <20050523213155.GA46718@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050523213609.GA47212@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20050523213609.GA47212@xor.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200505252342.01938.freebsd.nospam@mekanix.dk> Cc: Mike Jakubik , Matthias Buelow , Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: Performance of 4.x vs 5.x (Re: Lifetime of FreeBSD branches) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 21:41:23 -0000 On Monday 23 May 2005 23:36, Kris Kennaway wrote: > Also try defining PREEMPTION in your kernel on 5.x and above (if you > are running i386 or amd64). There have been very occasional reports > of panics with this option enabled (although I use it everywhere and > have not seen problems on my heavily loaded machines), but interactive > response should be much better. I've had PREEMTION enabled in 5-STABLE for at couple of month and had the opposite experience. Eg. when clicking on a file in a fileselector (I'm using KDE) it would take 2-3 seconds before the file got highlighted. After disabling PREEMTION again responsetime seems to have improved. Bjarne