From nobody Tue Mar 19 07:23:06 2024 X-Original-To: freebsd-current@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4TzNVb2zZrz5DkVj for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 07:23:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from manu@bidouilliste.com) Received: from mx.blih.net (mx.blih.net [212.83.155.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4TzNVY73lGz4Gr4 for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 07:23:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from manu@bidouilliste.com) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bidouilliste.com; s=mx; t=1710832990; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=dnFBJs90vF4RefTxcBYy11+MATAKaBvU4s6WMIh1+wE=; b=FQHmWJ+2H7CL1U49jzWGHoLqAiTU+CClylSv4DEyAxWvFFFhe7Z8q7j7alPgYrwp4wElZp NA1shQeL4AM+g6zz0XoPrpsfyc1XW/dZXtOOWh5s0GkkYXF62bEMg6nxdoKXk/zN5CkwtS alCOlkot7cgCVO0FxYbGaeCGVSNHuHk= Received: from skull.home.blih.net (lfbn-lyo-1-2174-135.w90-66.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.66.97.135]) by mx.blih.net (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 93692e73 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); Tue, 19 Mar 2024 07:23:09 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 08:23:06 +0100 From: Emmanuel Vadot To: Alastair Hogge Cc: Freebsd Current Subject: Re: sysutils/pam_xdg: Cancelled on -CURRENT Message-Id: <20240319082306.f4ffef050d8439be07b10962@bidouilliste.com> In-Reply-To: <4e4a5f033f4169dd07f4afdd7b5f6976@riseup.net> References: <4e4a5f033f4169dd07f4afdd7b5f6976@riseup.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; amd64-portbld-freebsd15.0) List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:12876, ipnet:212.83.128.0/19, country:FR] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4TzNVY73lGz4Gr4 Hi, On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 06:54:27 +0000 Alastair Hogge wrote: > Hello, > > Recently a similar module (PAM) mentioned in the subject was committed > to base[1]. The module in base masks the currently installed Port, the > man page can be accessed with man -M /usr/local/share/man 8 pam_xdg, > however, I can now no longer build the Port. I noticed that the base > module has no WITHOUT_ option, tho, that might be extreme for one > module, but then again, the base module masks a more feature full > module. What is the practice to enable use of the Port again? At the > moment I am updating my host, and testing the following: > > diff --git a/lib/libpam/modules/modules.inc > b/lib/libpam/modules/modules.inc > index f3ab65333f4f..ddbb326f0312 100644 > --- a/lib/libpam/modules/modules.inc > +++ b/lib/libpam/modules/modules.inc > @@ -30,4 +30,3 @@ MODULES += pam_ssh > .endif > MODULES += pam_tacplus > MODULES += pam_unix > -MODULES += pam_xdg > \ No newline at end of file > > 1: > https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/commit/?id=6e69612d5df1c1d5bd86990ea4d9a170c030b292 > > Thanks. > I don't see why you can't build the ports. Using would be a problem but why do you want to use it now that we have one in base ? Do you have any problems with the one in base ? Cheers, -- Emmanuel Vadot