From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Mar 28 10:54:23 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (castles504.castles.com [208.214.165.68]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B3CF1531B for ; Sun, 28 Mar 1999 10:53:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (LOCALHOST [127.0.0.1]) by dingo.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA06574; Sun, 28 Mar 1999 10:47:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Message-Id: <199903281847.KAA06574@dingo.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: Darren Reed Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: another ufs panic.. In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 29 Mar 1999 00:20:57 +1000." <199903281420.AAA18161@cheops.anu.edu.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 28 Mar 1999 10:47:19 -0800 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > I never realised ufs was so bad on freebsd...I experienced another > panic whilst using pax to copy one fs to another (was already 90% there > on the destination due to the crash from dump/restore). UFS is fine, but you may have a corrupted disk. No filesystem works well under those circumstances. > ...there have been substantial ufs improvements in 3.x, yes ? Mostly in the realm of soft updates. UFS hasn't been broken, so it doesn't seem to need fixing. -- \\ Sometimes you're ahead, \\ Mike Smith \\ sometimes you're behind. \\ mike@smith.net.au \\ The race is long, and in the \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ end it's only with yourself. \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message