From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 1 15:48:15 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFB0C16A421 for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2005 15:48:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jwm-freebsd@sentinelchicken.net) Received: from dukecmmtar01.coxmail.com (dukecmmtar01.coxmail.com [68.99.120.48]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D41243D4C for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2005 15:48:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jwm-freebsd@sentinelchicken.net) Received: from sentinelchicken.net ([70.183.13.213]) by dukecmmtar01.coxmail.com (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with SMTP id <20051101154818.LPES2173.dukecmmtar01.coxmail.com@sentinelchicken.net> for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2005 10:48:18 -0500 Received: (qmail 90968 invoked by uid 1000); 1 Nov 2005 15:48:12 -0000 Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 10:48:12 -0500 From: Jason Morgan To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20051101154812.GA90735@sentinelchicken.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Re: Quick Routing Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2005 15:48:16 -0000 On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 07:03:26AM -0800, Brian E. Conklin wrote: > Do you have gateway_enable="YES" in your rc.conf? Yes, I do. The FreeBSD works fine for routing to the outside, it's between the subnets where I run into issues. > > Brian E. Conklin, MCP+I, MCSE > Director of Information Services > Mason General Hospital > http://www.masongeneral.com > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Jason Morgan > Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 9:42 PM > To: FreeBSD Questions > Subject: Quick Routing Question > > > I am setting up a wireless subnet and, while the gateway (FreeBSD > system) is communicating fine with the wireless router, my other subnet > is not able to connect to the wireless router. Here is a diagram of my > network, I think it's fairly typical. > > > Wired Subnet (10.0.0.x) > / > / > Internet <-- FreeBSD Machine > \ > \ > Wireless Subnet (192.168.1.x) > > > The 'wired' interface on the FreeBSD machine has an IP of 10.0.0.1, with > the 'wireless' IP being 192.168.1.1. Now, the FreeBSD machine and the > wireless router (192.168.1.2) communicate fine as does the wired subnet; > however, I am not able to connect from a 10.0.0.x client to the wireless > router. After running traceroute, etc, it seems that the FreeBSD machine > is simply not routing the data from one subnet to the other. I've > verified that it's not the firewall blocking packets. How do I get these > subnets to communicate? > > Thanks, > Jason > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > ===================================================================== > Mason General Hospital > 901 Mt. View Drive > PO Box 1668 > Shelton, WA 98584 > http://www.masongeneral.com > (360) 426-1611 > ===================================================================== > This message is intended for the sole use of the individual and entity > to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, > confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you > are not the addressee nor authorized to receive for the addressee, you > are hereby notified that you may not use, copy, disclose or distribute > to anyone this message or any information contained in the message. If > you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the > sender and delete the message. > > Replying to this message constitutes consent to electronic monitoring > of this message. > > Thank you. >