From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 21 06:50:19 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAFC210656A4 for ; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 06:50:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bf1783@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f213.google.com (mail-ew0-f213.google.com [209.85.219.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 828198FC0C for ; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 06:50:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy5 with SMTP id 5so5643613ewy.34 for ; Sun, 20 Dec 2009 22:50:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=LvSdEqIq434uWvQ0X69RPjsmC/L65lPBWeVcJnJMGF8=; b=kCXQWSHnpnokjMNuPwE+ezFz+tEjLIi8Qetp0WXrid5TbQt68R6Gs0N7Jm5WHXcKus dVP2C5KgwydBUhP7pP8e8qTK6Qg1jAKY0wLok2KUFR6BrgpMp0f20jD0ZcM8/NEC4qyt CRN+liRJ8wEHs5QCUERIsQnHO/K9CeqIRjNEE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=dGZ39hqrIw6IzG9CpbRnUDiPyCRe+VQr0LySbH4WqeJpoF4M1Ldfc57Z8UHAarH0R7 749EpDnEzlfciNzT8cKD0S+kuhpJI+A/FetwZQCYffkoINfhS9V64XxBTcZsP26pA9nr LnrVX5tgJjAucKC1bZuRwnCA58CxpnAy8Ur9k= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.88.15 with SMTP id z15mr2951239wee.113.1261378218058; Sun, 20 Dec 2009 22:50:18 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20091221043301.GA62312@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> References: <20091221043301.GA62312@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 01:50:17 -0500 Message-ID: From: "b. f." To: Anton Shterenlikht Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: still trouble with pci.c on i386 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 06:50:20 -0000 On 12/20/09, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 08:22:42PM -0500, b. f. wrote: > > I havent' got svn installed, usually just do 'csup current-supfile'. > Are you saying I need to update my practices? > That's up to you. If you're checking the sources out as many users do, in checkout mode with the delete keyword, and you find that you need to revert a change locally, you've either got to make the changes by hand or perform at least one more checkout with -i and a date tag to revert the files affected by the change. Then you've got to protect your reversion during future updates. In my opinion, this is inconvenient, and if you can afford the extra disk space, you're probably better off using the VCS as it was meant to be used, by either using csup(1) in CVS mode, and using cvs(1) to manage your sources, or by using subversion. I think the latter is easier. b.