From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon Dec  9 01:59:38 1996
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id BAA25304
          for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 01:59:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from precipice.shockwave.com (ppp-206-170-5-166.rdcy01.pacbell.net [206.170.5.166])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id BAA25296;
          Mon, 9 Dec 1996 01:59:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from pst@localhost) by precipice.shockwave.com (8.8.4/8.7.3) id BAA00393; Mon, 9 Dec 1996 01:59:28 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 1996 01:59:28 -0800 (PST)
From: Paul Traina <pst@Shockwave.COM>
Message-Id: <199612090959.BAA00393@precipice.shockwave.com>
To: nate@freebsd.org
Subject: followup on pccardd problems...
Cc: hackers@freebsd.org
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


It's a memory allocation problem, but this stuff is driving me bonkers.

/etc/sysconfig has pccard memory set to default (d0000).
/etc/pccardd   has pccard blocks at default (d4000 96k).
the ed0 driver has had iomem set to d4000 (was d8000).

We're failing inside assign_io, specificly in allocate_memory.  We're
asking for 1024 / MEMUNIT memory, which means the count being passed
in to alloc_mem() is 0.  Is this sane?

Paul