From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Apr 12 08:30:14 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD68D106564A
	for <freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 12 Apr 2011 08:30:14 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org
	[IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FD228FC13
	for <freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 12 Apr 2011 08:30:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p3C8UE4C027234
	for <freebsd-bugs@freefall.freebsd.org>; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 08:30:14 GMT
	(envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p3C8UEM6027231;
	Tue, 12 Apr 2011 08:30:14 GMT (envelope-from gnats)
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 08:30:14 GMT
Message-Id: <201104120830.p3C8UEM6027231@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
From: Dan Strick <mla_strick@att.net>
Cc: 
Subject: Re: bin/155886: bc(1) sometimes mangles hexidecimal numbers
X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Dan Strick <mla_strick@att.net>
List-Id: Bug reports <freebsd-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 08:30:14 -0000

The following reply was made to PR bin/155886; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Dan Strick <mla_strick@att.net>
To: bug-followup@freebsd.org, coloncolonone@googlemail.com, mla_strick@att.net
Cc:  
Subject: Re: bin/155886: bc(1) sometimes mangles hexidecimal numbers
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 01:11:57 -0700 (PDT)

 > This seems to be somewhat similar to Debian Bug 84995 where one can find
 > some explanations: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=84995
 
 I took a look at the Debian bug report.  The author of the bc program
 explains:
 
 >   This is a result of having the number stored in base 10 and then
 > using other bases in the fractional values.  I can't quote the
 > posix document, but I'm sure this is legal behavior.
 
 The behavior may be "legal" (i.e. consistent with POSIX.2?), but it is
 sufficiently counterintuitive as to require specific mention on the bc
 man page.  In other words, this behavior is either a program bug or a
 documentation bug.  It cannot be neither.
 
 Dan Strick