Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 21 Jun 1999 20:19:48 +0200
From:      Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za>
To:        Doug <Doug@gorean.org>
Cc:        Doug <Studded@gorean.org>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>, freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG, alex@wnm.net
Subject:   Re: [Fwd: Re: misc/11796: Bad lines in 3.2-RELEASE inetd.conf] 
Message-ID:  <21442.929989188@axl.noc.iafrica.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 21 Jun 1999 11:12:26 MST." <Pine.BSF.4.05.9906211108320.15079-100000@dt054n86.san.rr.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On Mon, 21 Jun 1999 11:12:26 MST, Doug wrote:

> 	Can you point out exactly what part of the man page that you are
> referring to that contradicts what the inetd man page says? Have you
> checked the actual code for inetd to verify that it will work with
> services aliases? 

Certainly. From services(5):

     The services file contains information regarding the known services
     available in the DARPA Internet.  For each service a single line should
     be present with the following information:

           official service name
           port number
           protocol name
           aliases

We wouldn't be straying too far from reality if we interpretated the
word "alias" as "another name for".

We now look at /etc/services and see:

auth            113/tcp    ident tap    #Authentication Service
auth            113/udp    ident tap    #Authentication Service

We read from this that each of "ident" and "tap" is "another name for"
"auth".

We now look et /etc/inetd.conf, where we find:

#ident  stream  tcp     wait    kmem:kmem       /usr/local/sbin/identd identd -w -t120

I uncommented this line a few years ago and haven't had a problem with
my ident service that I could think of.

> 	In my experience, and in the experience of the PR poster it *is*
> necessary to use the canonical name of the service, however if you can
> check the code, test it thoroughly and determine that inetd works
> perfectly well with aliases, then feel free to change the man page for
> inetd. 

Since the manpage supports my experience thus far, I really can't see
how you'd put the burden of proof on me. :-)

Let's see a "How-To-Repeat" of somewhat more substance than "Try running
identd without having noticed the glitch".

Ciao,
Sheldon.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?21442.929989188>