From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Apr 12 11:57:40 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA15806 for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 12 Apr 1997 11:57:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from spooky.rwwa.com (rwwa.com [198.115.177.3]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA15799 for ; Sat, 12 Apr 1997 11:57:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from spooky.rwwa.com (localhost.rwwa.com [127.0.0.1]) by spooky.rwwa.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id WAA11662 for ; Fri, 11 Apr 1997 22:13:21 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <199704120213.WAA11662@spooky.rwwa.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0gamma 1/27/96 To: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Bogus bpf af from tun driver? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 11 Apr 1997 22:13:21 -0400 From: Robert Withrow Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk The tun driver prepends what it calls the address family to the packet it passes to bpf. I get it as 0x02.00.00.00 which looks like AF_INET in some weird byte-swapped state... This is wrong, right? Should it HTONL or something? ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Robert Withrow, Tel: +1 617 592 8935, Net: witr@rwwa.COM