From owner-freebsd-www@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 2 10:56:40 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-www@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5894516A4D2; Tue, 2 Dec 2003 10:56:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from rwcrmhc12.comcast.net (rwcrmhc12.comcast.net [216.148.227.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8954743FA3; Tue, 2 Dec 2003 10:56:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from underway@comcast.net) Received: from localhost.localdomain (12-230-74-101.client.attbi.com[12.230.74.101]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc12) with ESMTP id <20031202185632014007pjvse>; Tue, 2 Dec 2003 18:56:32 +0000 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hB2IuDTG010501; Tue, 2 Dec 2003 10:56:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from underway@comcast.net) Received: (from jojo@localhost) by localhost.localdomain (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id hB2Iu8rr010500; Tue, 2 Dec 2003 10:56:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from underway@comcast.net) To: Tom Rhodes References: <20031201133128.1eee8ecf.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> <6cad6cjo0q.d6c@mail.comcast.net> <20031201160628.3df5ff8e.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> From: underway@comcast.net (Gary W. Swearingen) Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 10:56:08 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20031201160628.3df5ff8e.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> (Tom Rhodes's message of "Mon, 1 Dec 2003 16:06:28 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) XEmacs/21.4 (Portable Code, berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: FreeBSD-www@FreeBSD.org cc: FreeBSD-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: RFC: Restructure of the front page X-BeenThere: freebsd-www@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Project Webmasters List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 18:56:40 -0000 Tom Rhodes writes: > The key word here is 'mentions', and the idea here is not to just > mention, but link to information. But that is a BAD idea, IMO, given the information that you propose be linked to and where you propose to place the links. The key word was "user"; the information is not appropriate for users who are not developers. It's worse PR than letting them think that the web site is incomplete, IMO. It also discourages the writing of something appropriate for them.