From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Oct 11 18:13:44 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1B931065863;
	Mon, 11 Oct 2010 18:13:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org)
Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [65.122.17.42])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 815FB8FC12;
	Mon, 11 Oct 2010 18:13:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (66.111.2.69.static.nyinternet.net
	[66.111.2.69])
	by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 27CEC46B0C;
	Mon, 11 Oct 2010 14:13:43 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (smtp.hudson-trading.com [209.249.190.9])
	by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 34DC58A009;
	Mon, 11 Oct 2010 14:13:42 -0400 (EDT)
From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 11:50:00 -0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/7.3-CBSD-20100819; KDE/4.4.5; amd64; ; )
References: <20101004123725.65d09b9e.daichi@ongs.co.jp>
	<AANLkTi=w5ZAfRymSYbL6X37uyYX17J2dW8LHVcPXZ_+b@mail.gmail.com>
	<20101005153926.88b4c1e1.daichi@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <20101005153926.88b4c1e1.daichi@freebsd.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201010111150.00785.jhb@freebsd.org>
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6
	(bigwig.baldwin.cx); Mon, 11 Oct 2010 14:13:42 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.3 at bigwig.baldwin.cx
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=4.2 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on bigwig.baldwin.cx
Cc: Daichi GOTO <daichi@freebsd.org>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org,
	Garrett Cooper <gcooper@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: fcntl always fails to delete lock file, and PID is always -6464
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 18:13:44 -0000

On Tuesday, October 05, 2010 2:39:26 am Daichi GOTO wrote:
> Next step discussion engaged from this research I guess.
> 
> Should we do change FreeBSD's fcntl(2) to return correct l_pid
> when called with F_SETLK?  Or keep current behavior??
> I want to hear other developers ideas and suggetions.

POSIX doesn't say that F_SETLK returns a valid l_pid, so I think FreeBSD's 
current behavior is fine.

-- 
John Baldwin