From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Jan 26 8:21:43 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from a96180.upc-a.chello.nl (a96180.upc-a.chello.nl [62.163.96.180]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5A1E37B400 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2002 08:21:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by a96180.upc-a.chello.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 465A9216F; Sat, 26 Jan 2002 17:21:33 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2002 17:21:33 +0100 From: Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai To: Cliff Sarginson Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Firewall config non-intuitiveness Message-ID: <20020126162132.GT68034@daemon.ninth-circle.org> References: <20020125210254.B454@yip.org> <20020125181141.N55633-100000@rockstar.stealthgeeks.net> <20020126030629.GA1290@raggedclown.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020126030629.GA1290@raggedclown.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.24i Organisation: Ninth Circle Enterprises Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG -On [20020126 04:15], Cliff Sarginson (cliff@raggedclown.net) wrote: >I also happen to believe the status-quo is in need of change. Not in STABLE. Solve it in CURRENT, and perhaps backport it, but make sure that whatever happens to STABLE is: 1) well-documented 2) solved in such a way it doesn't counteract current practice, but rather clarifies it. -- Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven / asmodai / Kita no Mono / xMach coreteam asmodai@[wxs.nl|xmach.org], finger asmodai@ninth-circle.org http://www.softweyr.com/asmodai/ Great spirits have always found violent opposition from mediocre minds. The latter cannot understand it when a man does not thoughtlessly submit to hereditary prejudices but honestly and courageously uses his intelligence... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message