From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 13 10:07:44 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF42F106566C for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 10:07:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from christopher-ml@telting.org) Received: from mail.telting.org (mail.telting.org [204.109.56.249]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5AE88FC0C for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 10:07:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ares.local (cpe-76-168-204-255.socal.res.rr.com [76.168.204.255]) by mail.telting.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0345D2846A; Fri, 13 May 2011 10:07:42 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4DCD02EF.7050808@telting.org> Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 03:07:43 -0700 From: Chris Telting User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110429 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: krad References: <4DC9DE2C.6070605@telting.org> <201105121657.57647.j.mckeown@ru.ac.za> <4DCBFC39.8060900@telting.org> <201105130932.32144.j.mckeown@ru.ac.za> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Established method to enable suid scripts? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 10:07:44 -0000 On 05/13/2011 01:32, krad wrote: > what i cant understand is the complete aversion to sudo. Could you > shed any light on why you are trying to avoid a tried and tested method. That I freely admit is for no rational reason. It's just annoying. But let me ask you.. is "sudo ping" acceptable? Please explain the logical reason why not. It would be the preferred method if suid didn't exist and sudo was part of the base system. Happy Friday.