From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 13 20:08:11 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D45816A4CE for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2005 20:08:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from otter3.centtech.com (moat3.centtech.com [207.200.51.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97B3E43D2D for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2005 20:08:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from anderson@centtech.com) Received: from [10.177.171.220] (neutrino.centtech.com [10.177.171.220]) by otter3.centtech.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id j0DK87OJ031103; Thu, 13 Jan 2005 14:08:08 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from anderson@centtech.com) Message-ID: <41E6D51F.1020001@centtech.com> Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 14:07:59 -0600 From: Eric Anderson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20041110 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Charles Hatvany References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org cc: gcoon@inch.com Subject: Re: DNS Black list suggestions? X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 20:08:11 -0000 Charles Hatvany wrote: > I have had good experience with njabl.org. They are also able and willing to check all your incoming IP addresses for being open relays, if you want to go to that extent. > > Charles > > >>>>Gerald 01/13 9:47 AM >>> > > On Thu, 13 Jan 2005, Eric Anderson wrote: > > >>I've heard that they have come a long way - does anyone have any preferences, >>warnings, etc? I'm interested in free blacklists only.. > > > DSBL http://dsbl.org/main is good at the front door for blocks. After > that we SpamAssassin tag it and let the end user decide. SA uses the > SURBL and SPF and other things you wouldn't want to outright block on > in consideration without removing the ability to bypass (whitelist) the > filter. > > Warnings? Only the usual, be very picky with blacklists. There is a big > difference between even confirmed and unconfirmed dsbl. Thanks for all the suggestions (both on and off list)! Eric -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric Anderson Sr. Systems Administrator Centaur Technology I have seen the future and it is just like the present, only longer. ------------------------------------------------------------------------