Date: Sun, 12 Oct 1997 13:30:54 +0930 From: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fnord0: disabled, not probed. Message-ID: <199710120400.NAA00975@word.smith.net.au> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 11 Oct 1997 20:32:02 MST." <12637.876627122@time.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> The only conceivable counter-argument I can see concerns the psm0 > entry which is disabled by default in the distributed GENERIC, it > being a plausible argument that the "psm0: disabled, not probed." > message at boot-time served as a much needed indicator of its disabled > state should the user actually want to have it enabled. On the other > hand, I seem to recall some folks also talking about the ps/2 mouse > driver finally reaching a level of maturity where it could just be > enabled by default, and I'd rather have that happen in any case if > it's possible. Nate did this at least in -current a few days back. I've never had any grief with the new split-architecture keyboard driver, so I'd be happy to see this in 2.2.x as well. > So what do folks think, can I kill it? I'd say "yes". mike
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199710120400.NAA00975>