Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2005 22:58:38 -0600 From: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> To: Nikhil Dharashivkar <nikhildharashivkar@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, "Rajesh S. Ghanekar" <rajesh_ghanekar@persistent.co.in>, freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Adding new option to ktrace Message-ID: <431D21FE.4080305@samsco.org> In-Reply-To: <17db6d3a05090521494a284c01@mail.gmail.com> References: <17db6d3a0509051000622868bc@mail.gmail.com> <431C8D5B.7080309@samsco.org> <431C92F2.9090104@persistent.co.in> <431C93DD.20402@samsco.org> <17db6d3a05090521494a284c01@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Nikhil Dharashivkar wrote: > Yes, what rajesh saying is right , i want to print IO Bytes. You want to capture writes coming from userland, or you want to capture all low-level disk writes? Are you trying to correlate these writes with a particular user process? Consider an mmaped file. A userland program will modify the memory fronting the file, at at some point the pagedaemon kthread will come in and flush those dirty pages, independent of the user process. Also, like I said, device strategy routines are decoupled from the syscall callers by the g_down kthread. Trying to figure out the userland thread from dastrategy that is responsible for the I/O is going to be tricky, if even possible at all. Scott > > On 9/6/05, Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> wrote: > >>Rajesh S. Ghanekar wrote: >> >>>Scott Long wrote: >>> >>> >>>>Nikhil Dharashivkar wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>Hi, >>>>> i want to hack the ktrace system call. Basically, I want to monitor >>>>>scsi disk IO through dastrategy() routine. >>>>> It seems that kern_ktrace.c implements different functions for >>>>>ktrace options like -tc / -ti ... etc (see man page). So, is it >>>>>possible to add new option for disk IO with new structure object >>>>>containing disk io information which will be pass to >>>>>ktr_submittrequest thr' ktr_request structure. >>>>> Will data will be written correctly in ktrace.out and will >>>>>kdump analyze that ? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>What are you trying to monitor? Would the existing devstat interface >>>>work? >>> >>> >>>May be he requires how many bytes transferred (read/write) while a >>>process is executing. >>>I guess devstat doesn't do it from process context, it gives total IO >>>read/writes from a device, >>>if registred via devstat. Please correct me if I am wrong. >>> >>> >>>- Rajesh >>> >> >>There isn't a 1:1 correlation between the bytes that the userland >>program writes, and the bytes that actually get written to disk. >>Filesystem metadata writes will happen if the file needs to be >>extended, not to mention the access time being updated. Some writes >>won't even originate from a userland program, like swap writes. >>GEOM also decouples the I/O path, so it's not the user process that >>will actually do the write, it's the g_down kthread. I would think >>that this would make tracking I/O via ktrace very hard. >> >>Scott >> > > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?431D21FE.4080305>