From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 25 16:55:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AEC610656F3 for ; Tue, 25 May 2010 16:55:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mj@feral.com) Received: from ns1.feral.com (ns1.feral.com [192.67.166.1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02F248FC17 for ; Tue, 25 May 2010 16:55:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.221.2] (remotevpn [192.168.221.2]) by ns1.feral.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o4PGt7DJ070816 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 25 May 2010 09:55:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mj@feral.com) Message-ID: <4BFC00E7.1060307@feral.com> Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 09:55:03 -0700 From: Matthew Jacob Organization: Feral Software User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org References: <201005251450.o4PEo9tF099503@fire.js.berklix.net> <4BFC004F.1090101@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <4BFC004F.1090101@elischer.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender DNS name whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.3 (ns1.feral.com [192.168.221.1]); Tue, 25 May 2010 09:55:18 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: GSoC: BSD text tools X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 16:55:19 -0000 On 5/25/2010 9:52 AM, Julian Elischer wrote: > On 5/25/10 8:33 AM, Eitan Adler wrote: >>> No. Do not remove groff or associated tools from /usr/src ! >>> Roff has been in Unix /usr/src since '77 or earlier. >>> A lot of people use tools from that descendancy as production tools. >> >> So? If it isn't a very commonly used tool and isn't necessary for 99% >> of cases I don't seem the harm of removing it from base and making it >> a port? > > BSD has always been ab;e to produce it's documentation as part of its > build > > Please keep this true. Absolutely. There are tons of documents out there still in -ms or -mm format.