From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 15 23:39:04 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A44C11065670 for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 23:39:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C46C78FC1E for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 23:39:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id mBFNd0OF057050; Tue, 16 Dec 2008 00:39:00 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) with ESMTP id mBFNd0JJ057047; Tue, 16 Dec 2008 00:39:00 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 00:39:00 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: prad In-Reply-To: <20081215152317.50e78aa4@gom.home> Message-ID: <20081216003434.I57019@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <20081215133957.4ef356ec@gom.home> <20081215231835.Y56482@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20081215152317.50e78aa4@gom.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: power management X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 23:39:04 -0000 > >> Simply - install linux, then FreeBSD on same machine and check it :) >> > :D > ya that's what's important here at least. anyway - just using hlt instruction greatly reduces CPU power usage even at full clock. i don't think the difference is THAT huge by reducing clock multipliers, voltage etc. on my laptop i don't even looked at this, and it works about 2 times longer under little CPU load than under full load. and it has hard drive and display that use power. CPU itself isn't big power eater (it's pentium-M 1200). Of course on "modern" CPUs having >>100W TDP it may make a difference. > not that i'm concerned, i'm not going back to linux (even though i > liked it while i used it). me too - until kernels 2.0.*, then it wasn't usable (stable) anymore.