From owner-freebsd-security@freebsd.org Wed Nov 11 11:56:10 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB6DCA2C6CE; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:56:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from smtp.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A302E157F; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:56:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from desk.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A80F279B; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:56:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by desk.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 621003F9C4; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 12:56:06 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: Julian Elischer Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenSSH HPN References: <86io5a9ome.fsf@desk.des.no> <564309D8.7020307@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 12:56:06 +0100 In-Reply-To: <564309D8.7020307@freebsd.org> (Julian Elischer's message of "Wed, 11 Nov 2015 17:26:48 +0800") Message-ID: <86twos7ns9.fsf@desk.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:56:11 -0000 Julian Elischer writes: > The inclusion of the HPN patches meant that we could drop a custom > unsupported HPN enabled ssh from our build process. It makes ssh > actually usable. Define "usable". Does it actually make a measurable difference with the latest OpenSSH? And if HPN is so important to you, is there a reason why you can't use the port? DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no