From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 6 06:36:10 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 822C41065670 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2009 06:36:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stark@mapper.nl) Received: from smtp-out2.tiscali.nl (smtp-out2.tiscali.nl [195.241.79.177]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18A368FC0A for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2009 06:36:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [82.170.17.27] (helo=mapper.nl) by smtp-out2.tiscali.nl with esmtp (Exim) (envelope-from ) id 1MYwa8-00063i-O9; Thu, 06 Aug 2009 08:36:08 +0200 Received: from bowser ([192.168.0.1] helo=[0.0.0.0]) by mapper.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1MYwZj-000Hgf-UQ; Thu, 06 Aug 2009 08:35:43 +0200 Message-ID: <4A7A79BC.1030600@mapper.nl> Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2009 08:35:40 +0200 From: Mark Stapper User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mel Flynn References: <200908051414.49468.david@vizion2000.net> <20090805132755.GA21963@falcon.midgard.homeip.net> <200908050654.26375.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> In-Reply-To: <200908050654.26375.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigE19012D0F9C53655D52965F8" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kernel designations terminology confusion -- amd64 used for into quad core X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2009 06:36:10 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigE19012D0F9C53655D52965F8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mel Flynn wrote: > On Wednesday 05 August 2009 05:27:55 Erik Trulsson wrote: > > =20 >> The amd64 architecture is called that because it was AMD who invented = and >> created it and was for a while the only one using it and since AMD nam= ed >> the architecture AMD64 that was the name FreeBSD used too. Later Inte= l >> also started using it (while using their own name(s) for it), but Free= BSD >> has stuck with the name amd64. >> =20 > > This isn't completely correct. There is actually an ia64 architecture, = before=20 > Intel was ready to give up the "who dictates the PC 64bit architecture"= =20 > battle. There's a handful of CPU's who use that instruction set, but la= ter=20 > Intel switched to supporting AMD's instruction set and thus the PC 64 b= it=20 > architecture now is amd64. > > It'll be fun to see people asking in a few years why Oracle processors = are=20 > called "sparc64"... > =20 Now I come to think of it, isn't it strange apple(or IBM) never joined in the whole 64-bits naming race spactacle. No one ever calls a PowerPC 970 processor a PowerPC-64, or a IBM64 or anything like it... Nor have I ever heard the term RISC64. Too bad we won't have to worry about that anymore, since PowerPC is dead and Mac Pro's are now amd64(or Intel 64 or x86-64 whichever would be the "correct" term ;-) ) --------------enigE19012D0F9C53655D52965F8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkp6eb8ACgkQN9xNqOOVnWDJKwCgjH4rK+zROQk5qAke2GQTc/0E g0EAn1hGVXde5NkIvg/5VB9yLLoMcVwY =0ecg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigE19012D0F9C53655D52965F8--