From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 15 02:36:58 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CD14E17 for ; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 02:36:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from schultz@ime.usp.br) Received: from netuno.ime.usp.br (netuno.ime.usp.br [143.107.45.90]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F039E8FC16 for ; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 02:36:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from arachne.ime.usp.br (arachne.ime.usp.br [143.107.45.22]) by netuno.ime.usp.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02BD21278CD5; Sun, 14 Oct 2012 23:36:48 -0300 (BRT) Received: by arachne.ime.usp.br (Postfix, from userid 112) id F053C36D6001; Sun, 14 Oct 2012 23:36:47 -0300 (BRT) Received: from b1201654.virtua.com.br (b1201654.virtua.com.br [177.32.22.84]) by webmail.ime.usp.br (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Sun, 14 Oct 2012 23:36:47 -0300 Message-ID: <20121014233647.21466wdumwtyvflr@webmail.ime.usp.br> Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2012 23:36:47 -0300 From: schultz@ime.usp.br To: Adam Vande More Subject: Re: Sysctls and privacy References: <20121012095915.470864k9735iy883@webmail.ime.usp.br> <20121013101545.GA21274@external.screwed.box> <20121013120939.18067gfy2u4vdzjn@webmail.ime.usp.br> <20121014140148.GA5344@external.screwed.box> <20121014223328.16140uoyo4x5dii0@webmail.ime.usp.br> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.3.10) X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,MISSING_MID, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on netuno.ime.usp.br Cc: Peter Vereshagin , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 02:36:58 -0000 > Says who? Is this your requirement? Why? I meant I don't see how it can be done differently. > If this is really a serious concern of yours, you have much bigger fish to > fry than sysctl(8). Can you elaborate a bit more on this please?