From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Dec 21 08:39:25 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: emulation@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB5D1106566C
	for <emulation@freebsd.org>; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 08:39:25 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from alexander@leidinger.net)
Received: from mail.ebusiness-leidinger.de (mail.ebusiness-leidinger.de
	[217.11.53.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84CF88FC16
	for <emulation@freebsd.org>; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 08:39:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from outgoing.leidinger.net (p57B3AD6F.dip.t-dialin.net
	[87.179.173.111])
	by mail.ebusiness-leidinger.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6775A844027;
	Tue, 21 Dec 2010 09:39:20 +0100 (CET)
Received: from unknown (IO.Leidinger.net [192.168.2.110])
	by outgoing.leidinger.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 895562938;
	Tue, 21 Dec 2010 09:39:16 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 09:39:15 +0100
From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net>
To: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
Message-ID: <20101221093915.0000789e@unknown>
In-Reply-To: <20101221035741.GA2710@lonesome.com>
References: <20101130192314.GB28560@lonesome.com>
	<20101201132220.790748omutg2pp6o@webmail.leidinger.net>
	<20101201153335.GA12007@lonesome.com>
	<20101202101413.132350uwhyrh6z0o@webmail.leidinger.net>
	<20101221035741.GA2710@lonesome.com>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.16.0; i586-pc-mingw32msvc)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-EBL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-EBL-MailScanner-ID: 6775A844027.A54AA
X-EBL-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-EBL-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, spamhaus-ZEN,
	SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-1, required 6, autolearn=disabled,
	ALL_TRUSTED -1.00)
X-EBL-MailScanner-From: alexander@leidinger.net
X-EBL-MailScanner-Watermark: 1293525560.87321@rHGu3OKUePSWOF0kEurduA
X-EBL-Spam-Status: No
Cc: emulation@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: fwd: CFR: patch to cleanup usage of SRC_BASE in various ports
X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems
	<freebsd-emulation.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-emulation>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 08:39:25 -0000

On Tue, 21 Dec 2010 03:57:41 +0000 Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
wrote:

> >> How about this?  We change the override to only work if
> >> PACKAGE_BUILDING is set?
> >
> > This looks like a good plan.
> 
> OK, I thought it was a one-line patch per port, but that's not true.
> 
> Please take a look at the following revised patch:
> 
> http://people.freebsd.org/~linimon/patches/diff.out.srcbase

I agree that a patch with less redundancy would be more complex and more
unreadable as what you propose here, so no objections from my side.

Bye,
Alexander.