From owner-freebsd-current Sun Jan 11 21:15:58 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id VAA27265 for current-outgoing; Sun, 11 Jan 1998 21:15:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current) Received: from dyson.iquest.net (dyson.iquest.net [198.70.144.127]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA27188; Sun, 11 Jan 1998 21:14:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from toor@dyson.iquest.net) Received: (from root@localhost) by dyson.iquest.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) id AAA00234; Mon, 12 Jan 1998 00:14:23 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from toor) From: "John S. Dyson" Message-Id: <199801120514.AAA00234@dyson.iquest.net> Subject: Re: Still not fixed, but closer In-Reply-To: from Julian Elischer at "Jan 11, 98 08:59:30 pm" To: julian@whistle.com (Julian Elischer) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 1998 00:14:22 -0500 (EST) Cc: dyson@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL31 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Julian Elischer said: > ok so vfs_subr.c 1.123 is still buggy? > it's hard to know what version you're talking about.. > > thanks by the way for doing all this work and taking it seriously enough > to be so concerned about keeping us posted. > vfs_subr.c 1.123 should be the first version that I think might be okay. Feedback regarding a kernel with this version of vfs_subr would be very much appreciated. -- John | Never try to teach a pig to sing, dyson@freebsd.org | it just makes you look stupid, jdyson@nc.com | and it irritates the pig.