Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 20:40:55 -1000 From: Gary Dunn <knowtree@aloha.com> To: Alexander Motin <mav@freebsd.org> Cc: FreeBSD acpi <freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org>, "Paul B. Mahol" <onemda@gmail.com>, freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org, FreeBSD-Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Fighting for the power. Message-ID: <1242110455.2664.9.camel@slate01> In-Reply-To: <4A08B10E.4040702@FreeBSD.org> References: <49FE1826.4060000@FreeBSD.org> <4A07BC4D.7080604@freebsd.org> <4A081868.6010906@FreeBSD.org> <3a142e750905111308o62a11c8em5465ea9aa1cfaebc@mail.gmail.com> <4A08B10E.4040702@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 02:13 +0300, Alexander Motin wrote: ... > > What's about general effect, the main idea here is the same as in audio > processing: result mostly depends on quality of the worst component. > Your system may just have some other consumers which I don't have. For > example, desktop CPU instead of mobile, desktop chipset instead of > mobile, powerful external video instead of (or even in addition to) > built-in, and so on. > Interesting point. Is there a power consumption benchmark for evaluating hardware for use with FreeBSD? -- Gary Dunn, Honolulu osp@aloha.com http://openslate.net/ http://e9erust.blogspot.com/ Sent from Slate001
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1242110455.2664.9.camel>