Date: Sun, 11 Jan 1998 19:32:27 -0500 From: Charlie Root <root@scsn.net> To: "John S. Dyson" <toor@dyson.iquest.net> Cc: John Kelly <jak@cetlink.net>, dmaddox@scsn.net, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 16650 Support(?) Message-ID: <19980111193227.04735@scsn.net> In-Reply-To: <199801120007.TAA00316@dyson.iquest.net>; from John S. Dyson on Sun, Jan 11, 1998 at 07:07:35PM -0500 References: <34b95e60.140553@mail.cetlink.net> <199801120007.TAA00316@dyson.iquest.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jan 11, 1998 at 07:07:35PM -0500, John S. Dyson wrote:
> John Kelly said:
> > On Sun, 11 Jan 1998 15:06:19 -0500, dmaddox@scsn.net (Donald J.
> > Maddox) wrote:
> >
> > > I recently bought a 16C650-based LavaPort ISA card to support the
> > >230,400 bps capability of my ISDN modem. It works fine under W95, but
> > >does _not_ work fine under FBSD-current.
> >
> > The 650 support seems to be broken, so don't flag it as a 650. Run it
> > as a 550 and it should work fine. You still get the benefit of the
> > deeper FIFO, even when it's defined as a 550. You don't get the auto
> > CTS/RTS flow control, but that has questionable value anyway.
> >
> I have a 16650 based card, and it appears to work well. It would be interesting
> to figure out why mine works, and others don't.
What kind of card do you have? I assume it's not a LavaPort...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980111193227.04735>