From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 1 16:32:19 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B329106564A for ; Sun, 1 May 2011 16:32:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA5558FC16 for ; Sun, 1 May 2011 16:32:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz12 with SMTP id 12so5919803bwz.13 for ; Sun, 01 May 2011 09:32:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Ut6mvXraozzQ2YZ72qz9WFNk+ZdgRT1tmm3JnCed5HU=; b=HIc98LgHOPKwjRL+zSKWpat4q1e74bIVxCANuIA9wCMRna8nmyGxRTM3Lo1T6dfPeq 8Q20ogZeUKp4bvZHKXgAp4H3dTaLK7njblms/DVRRTTPf8B+milKnAY4mYVFwHmHxaEl 4o4eV9J4Vf93lwXTHZfAla1EwxpWbu6QnsJJE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Kn//mYLopSQQK11sboDki88ZXdHi4NqRxVtqhNQ0YV8sE4WM86yMdHtICKrbERf+aG agHRd5X4MVa66W0JhZOL/Tn9P1xOeX1vcej6zVQzPc7sc95znwTts1JWy956Gm6O9Fae hHrN5XaMb2KqX9uUpdKNjUY65bMupYJmwF+gQ= Received: by 10.204.231.198 with SMTP id jr6mr398300bkb.205.1304267537110; Sun, 01 May 2011 09:32:17 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.42.21 with HTTP; Sun, 1 May 2011 09:31:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4DBCD165.8090508@forethought.net> <4DBD4200.2060404@gmail.com> From: Chris Rees Date: Sun, 1 May 2011 17:31:47 +0100 Message-ID: To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Maybe something useful, maybe not X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: utisoft@gmail.com List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 May 2011 16:32:19 -0000 On 1 May 2011 12:20, Glen Barber wrote: > On 5/1/11 2:34 AM, Chris Rees wrote: >>> "The geli utility is different than gbde" or as >> >> Please, no! >> >>> >>> "The geli utility is different from gbde" >> >> Yes, that's correct. >> > > Any particular reason why this one over the previous? =A0I think the > previous suggestion sounds more correct. A lifetime of my English teacher father yelling at me, as well as [1] for a start! Basically 'different to' is sometimes used in British English (though generally considered sloppy) and 'different than' is sometimes used in American English (though only recently 'accepted', and only in limited cases [2]). Nails on a chalkboard.... Please change it! Patch at [3]. Chris [1] http://www.uhv.edu/ac/newsletters/writing/grammartip2005.10.04.htm [2] http://www.dailywritingtips.com/different-from-different-to-different-t= han/ [3] http://www.bayofrum.net/~crees/patches/doc-handbook-disks-different-to.= diff