From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 2 02:49:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9F3216A4CE; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 02:49:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cell.sick.ru (cell.sick.ru [217.72.144.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5683643D1D; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 02:49:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from glebius@cell.sick.ru) Received: from cell.sick.ru (glebius@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cell.sick.ru (8.12.9/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i529nevw080418 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 2 Jun 2004 13:49:41 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from glebius@cell.sick.ru) Received: (from glebius@localhost) by cell.sick.ru (8.12.9/8.12.6/Submit) id i529nev8080417; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 13:49:40 +0400 (MSD) Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 13:49:40 +0400 From: Gleb Smirnoff To: Bosko Milekic Message-ID: <20040602094940.GA80394@cell.sick.ru> References: <20040531215101.GA60299@freefall.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040531215101.GA60299@freefall.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [HEADS-UP] mbuma is in the tree X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2004 09:49:47 -0000 Bosko, On Mon, May 31, 2004 at 02:51:01PM -0700, Bosko Milekic wrote: B> mbuma is an Mbuf & Cluster allocator built on top of a number of B> extensions to the UMA framework, all included herein. are you going to convert mbuf tag allocator to UMA? Now tags are allocated with malloc(). AFAIK, tags are used heavily in pf, and forthcoming ALTQ. Moving to UMA should affect their performance positively. -- Totus tuus, Glebius. GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE